The following issues were put and discussed, by ECOfishers at the Ministerial and Fisheries Department meeting with ECOfishers today, 31/1/08.
Present at the meeting were the two ministerial "fisheries policy advisors,"
Fisheries Chief Scientist, Fisheries Director, Bill Talbot and ECOfishers NSW CEO, Ken Thurlow, representing NSW recreational fishers. There was a frank and fruitful exchange of views at the hour and a half meeting.
ECOfishers thanks the Minister and NSW Fisheries for the invitation and the opportunity to meet again, to discuss NSW recreational fishers issues and
concerns.
FISH KILL: RECREATIONAL FISHERS ISSUES.
ECOfishers, submit the following issues to the Ministry and the Department, for their consideration, comment and where necessary, action.
1)Transfer of Effort: There is concern that the current closure may result in a significant transfer of recreational fishing effort, to nearby estuaries.(eg Evans River.) While ECOfishers are monitoring this possibility, (29/1/08 am. 3 boats on the river and the usual number of rock and beach fishers) there may be a need, if the closure is extended, to reduce bag limits in adjacent areas, during the Richmond closure.
2) Staged Re-opening: We recommend there be a staged re-opening of the Richmond, from the Recreational Fishing Haven (lower river) upstream.
3) Reduced bag limits: Similarly, there may be a need to have a reduced bag limit of species, during the re-opening phases. From memory, in 2001, we had a bag limit of 10 fish per person, including only 5 Bream and 1 Mulloway. The same limits may need to be re-applied, until the river and stocks, are sufficiently recovered.
4) Fish Kill Over: There is a public perception that the fish kill is over.
5) Acid Water: Yet the ?acid water,? which takes about 50 days to drain off the floodplain, hasn?t even been detected in the river yet. (The Tuckean, is currently loaded with acid water.) We can realistically look forward to a serious outbreak of, Red Spot Ulcers, on marine and freshwater stocks , as the river recovers.
6) Closed Gates: Currently all the floodgates on the river are closed. Farmers, who manage the gates, don?t want ?dirty water,? in their drains. Recreational fishers wonder is this appropriate and best management practises. (Some drains and gates are on Crown Land, therefore in public ownership, yet adjacent landholders have sole responsibility for managing ?their gates.? Recreational fishers find this anomaly, curious.)
7) Reduction in Recreational Licence Fees: ECOfishers has had a number of representations, concerning waiving part of their current recreational fishing licence fees, if the closure is to be extended beyond 18th February. And realistically, everyone expects it will be!
Perhaps we can make a case for those with annual licences and with local postcodes, to receive some sort of dispensation, or refund. Alternatively, a suitable reduction in next years licence fee, would be considered appropriate. We recognise it would be an administrative nightmare, but it is a real issue, for a number of recreational fishers. The Minister has already established a precedent, with a justifiable reduction in commercial licences fees.

Commercial fishing in Recreational Fishing Haven: As part of the sampling and monitoring program, commercial fishers will be working and harvesting in the Recreational Fishing Haven. There are two sensitive issues about this initiative. Firstly, commercial fishers will be working in the RFH, albeit under scientific permit. Secondly, commercial fishers may benefit financially, from this exercise. There are some objection to these initiatives, from a single quarter, a small group of ?sports fishers.? We are dealing with it and are confident we can
overcome it. As an alternative gesture, we suggest that recreational fishers be involved and included in the sampling, to take place in the RFH. It is seriously worth considering. It would make them feel part of the program. If necessary, ECOfishers is prepared to organize it.
9) Government Marine Park ? Cape Byron: Local communities still do not and will not support, the government?s marine park.
Non-compliance is organised and rife. Signs are continually vandalised. It is viewed as an unnecessary and unfair imposition, upon local communities. They feel no ownership of it whatsoever and consequently, ignore it. Succinctly, it?s not their park!
Ken Thurlow
CEO ECOfishers NSW. 31/1/08.